

2004 World Conference Legislation
G-4, Consideration of Homosexuality
From South Mississippi District:
Whereas, Numerous controversial issues arose in the previous Conference regarding the topic of homosexuality, which has led to dissention and divisiveness among the body of believers, and
Whereas, The continued presence of that dissention and divisiveness is not conducive to the efficient and effective pursuit of the church's divinely mandated mission, therefore be it
Resolved, That the representative body of the World Conference be given full opportunity both to discuss, and to vote upon, all issues and resolutions pertaining to the topic of homosexuality in the church during the 2004 World Conference without further delay or deferral. The issues to be discussed shall include, but not be limited to, ordination of homosexuals and the church's policy on same-sex marriages.
Ruling on G-4, Consideration of Homosexuality
President McMurray then drew the attention of the Conference to item G-4, “Consideration of Homosexuality,” on page 127 and then made the following statement:
This resolution also has at its foundation a principle which we fully
support, that being the right of the Conference to have a full discussion of
all items of substance that come before it. The presiding officers of the
Conference make every effort to ensure that those rights are protected,
sometimes bending the parliamentary rules a bit to allow for further
discussion when a more stringent interpretation would forbid it. We always
have to balance the desire of people to be heard with the right of the
Conference to determine how much debate it needs to hear or whether it
wishes to dispose of a matter through referral or postponement or other
legislative actions at its disposal.
This resolution seeks to impose by a majority vote a requirement that all
issues and resolutions on homosexuality be discussed and voted on “without
further delay or deferral.” However, it is impossible to bind the body by
a majority vote to a requirement that it can undo by a majority vote. To do
so would remove from the body the various methods it has to manage the
debate and to handle resolutions in accordance with the will of the
majority, and is therefore out of harmony with the procedural rules of this
assembly.
Further, this resolution requires a discussion and vote on matters that
are not properly before the body in any form, e.g., same-sex
marriages. It would therefore obligate the presiding officers to ask the
assembly to vote on a question about which there is no resolution proposed.
Therefore, because it is in violation of the parliamentary rules of the
assembly, and is not implementable in some of its provisions, we are
obligated to rule Item G-4 out of order. We would note that we are not
ruling out of order the resolutions on homosexuality that are properly
before the body. It will be the right of the Conference to determine whether
it wishes to consider those resolutions, refer them, or postpone action.
By way of further explanation, it has been the expressed desire of the
First Presidency that there be dialogue on the issue of homosexuality, just
as is requested in Item G-4. This week we have provided for more than thirty
discussion and information sessions and twenty-nine Listening Circles so
that a maximum number of people will be able to address their own
perspectives on this matter. We are also scheduling numerous Listening
Circles throughout the church to provide opportunity for this to be widely
considered, even beyond those who are able to attend World Conference. There
will be opportunity to pose questions to the Committee on Homosexuality and
the Church when its report is presented later in the week.
We will continue to look for occasions to openly discuss this important
issue, which can be so divisive and which we pray we can handle in a spirit
of love and mutual respect. However, for the reasons identified above we are
required to rule Item G-4 out of order.
|